Presented is the graph illustrating the investment money trend of five cooperation's for different sectors. All in all, it is transparent from the chart that the priority of supplement financings is different in each group; furthermore, it can be noticeable that organization B supplies more heavily funds than others, whereas organizations D, E have invested toward the lowest.
For machinery and building categories, the highest investment of building is organization A for over 1,5B; Simultaneously, only organization B is less slightly than A with an insignificant amount (0,4B), and three others groups have the same point at 1B. Next, machinery witnessed a lower level about supplement financings with the highest mark for over 1,3B is organization C. Organization A and B, D are the following lower points with 1b and over 0,9B( two groups equally), respectively.
Turning to the staff training and research sectors, the most notable investment of staff training is dedicated to organization B with over 1,8 B; unfortunately, the groups that help the field have the most heavily effective in all categories. Although the amount of money in organizations D, C is still lower than other organizations in the sector, accounting for over 0,7B and 0,8B, respectively, it is higher than the investment in different fields. The figures of organization B(1,6B) are significantly higher than equivalent figures for groups A, B, E in the research sector, at over1,2B and over 1,3B, 0,8B, respectively. Of course, organization D is investing the lowest money in both two industries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, still, whereas, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32128514056 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34544179063 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5140562249 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9298839672 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.222222222 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147513471339 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747332798916 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434783075695 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113031829628 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317496572753 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.