The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from 5 organizations.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Presented is the graph illustrating the investment money trend of five cooperation's for different sectors. All in all, it is transparent from the chart that the priority of supplement financings is different in each groups; furthermore, it can noticeable that organization B supplies more heavily funds than others, whereas organization D,E have invested toward the lowest.
For machinery and building categories, the most highly investment of building is organization A for over 1,5B; while there are only organization B less slightly than A with an insignificant amount (0,4B) and three others groups have same point at 1B. Next, machinery witnessed a lower level about supplement financings with the highest mark for over 1,3B is organization C. Organization A and B, D are the next lower points with 1b and over 0,9B( two groups equally), respectively.
Turning to the staff training and research sectors, the most notable investment of staff training is dedicated to organization B with over 1,8 B; unfortunately, the groups helps the field have the most heavily effective in all categories. Although the amount of money in organization D,C is still lower than other organization in the sector accounting for over 0,7B and 0,8B,respetively , it is higher than the investment in other field. The figures of organization B(1,6B) is significantly higher than equivalent figures for group A,B,E in research sector, at over1,2B and over 1,3B, 0,8B,respectively.Of course, organization D is investing the lowest money in both the two sectors.
It can clear see that staff training and research are invested more than other categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t sectors. All in all, it is transparent from the chart that the priority of supp...
^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , E
...unds than others, whereas organization D,E have invested toward the lowest. For m...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , C
...gh the amount of money in organization D,C is still lower than other organization ...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nting for over 0,7B and 0,8B,respetively , it is higher than the investment in oth...
^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , B
...gher than equivalent figures for group A,B,E in research sector, at over1,2B and o...
^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Of
...er1,2B and over 1,3B, 0,8B,respectively.Of course, organization D is investing the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, still, whereas, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36328125 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2947526822 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7945590728 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.555555556 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153235085497 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738713024219 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344941006613 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102399601857 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333174683727 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.