The line graph compares the amount of money which was invested in machinery, building, staff training and research from five different organizations.
Overall, organization B the amount of money spent a higher on categories in comparison with the others, while organizations D and E spend fewer categories than organization other. In addition, the amount of budget spent on building than compared to categories other,
Looking at the chart for the detail, it can be seen that organization B most spending on staff training about euro 1.9 million, while organizations D and E most spending on building around euro 1.0 million. In contrast organization B least spending on machinery about euro 0.9 million, while organizations D and E least spending research around 0.6, and 0.7 million euros respectively.
Turning to organization A spent the most money on building about euro 1.5 million, while organization C expenditure the most money on machinery and research around both euro 1.3 million. However organization A amount of money spent on staff training than organization C about euro 0.2 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...on building around euro 1.0 million. In contrast organization B least spending on machin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'B the least'.
Suggestion: B the least
...o 1.0 million. In contrast organization B least spending on machinery about euro 0.9 mi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'E the least'.
Suggestion: E the least
... 0.9 million, while organizations D and E least spending research around 0.6, and 0.7 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s D and E least spending research around 0.6, and 0.7 million euros respectively....
^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... research around both euro 1.3 million. However organization A amount of money spent on...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38505747126 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16123822845 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471264367816 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.581102224 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.166666667 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17103397859 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117047999719 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054845277737 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125248743291 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492657468611 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.