Many people argue that the internet has made it easier than ever before for youth and workers to accomplish their educational and career goals. I completely agree with this notion due to the convenience, cost-efficiency and greater availability of information on labor markets.
First and foremost, e-learning is superior to conventional classes in the following aspects. Due to unlimited operating hours of the internet, users can learn whenever they want. Those learning traditionally, however, have to attend school at a fixed time. Additionally, e-learning courses usually offer their lessons for free or for a low price, while those studying conventionally ought to pay a sum for tuition fees, books and even facilities on a monthly basis. As a result, e-learners are able to save money and allocate it to other critical areas, making their lives more comfortable.
Another justification for this trend is that online career information is superior to conventional methods. More specifically, the internet can provide up-to-the-minute information about the labor market, enabling users to obtain news in a matter of minutes. For example, by accessing career recruitment news on various platforms, unemployed workers are able to find jobs suiting their qualifications, working experiences as well as hobbies quickly. Those seeking a job through a newspaper or a career introduction center, however, have to spend quite a long time looking for a suitable job, which is time-consuming. Furthermore, users have more chances to get a deep insight into a company before being employed formally via staff’s comments on the internet, which helps them to find a truly good enterprise.
In conclusion, I believe that the internet has provided youngsters and staff with greater conveniences and the availability of learning materials as well as recruitment news. I also contend that there will be more individuals using the internet to improve their personal goals in the future due to its significant benefits.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
... the availability of learning materials as well as recruitment news. I also conten...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45192307692 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20671595289 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61858974359 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2388912291 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177196196188 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561447273344 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622504496706 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112921870616 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500139271261 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
... the availability of learning materials as well as recruitment news. I also conten...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45192307692 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20671595289 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61858974359 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2388912291 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177196196188 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561447273344 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622504496706 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112921870616 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500139271261 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.