Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Had it not been for the Internet, people had to spend hours in a library or seek advice from other people when they needed information. In my opinion, I strongly agree that the development of Internet technology has given us opportunities to accomplish our work and education goals more effortlessly in terms of time and a wide range of materials.
Firstly, it cannot deny that the Internet has played an essential role in providing a large volume of information. Search engines such as Google serves as a virtual library containing almost all knowledge as physical libraries do. However, it is easy to notice the difference between them by saying that searching information through the Internet merely takes from us a few seconds. Take a situation when a language learner encounters a rarely used word as an example. Is it not faster to type some keywords in the Google search box to get an answer than to run into a thousand pages dictionary? Thus, it is not an exaggeration to say that the Internet helps people gain more knowledge in a shorter time.
Secondly, while the knowledge students and workers gain from instruction in traditional textbooks can be confined to some common beliefs, the Internet is probably helpful in broadening their perspectives. For example, when discussing multi-gender, some education systems only teach people about the negative side based on the country or region's ethical beliefs. However, one can find more about the positive sides through blogs or forums on the Internet that encourage flexibility in their thinking. As a result, by giving people opportunities to reason their opinions, the Internet helps them develop their abilities and, therefore, increases their work and study proficiency.
In this modern world, when things are changing more rapidly than we can recognise, we should utilise the Internet to achieve our academic and professional pursuits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19480519481 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89901432002 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8776685501 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254471465345 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798280753937 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563895916207 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141601650361 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465325230817 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.