The given bar chart illustrates the percentage of two genders using the car for eight different purposes in 2005. By and large, more women than men took car trips for the purposes of courses, bank, running errands, visiting friends, and shopping. On the contrary, the percentage of men outstripped the women in terms of visiting town, recreation, and working.
For the particulars, with regard to the pinnacle, over 50% of the men commuted to work by car, as opposed to the number of men taking car trips for bank and running errands, accounting for under 5%. By the same token, the maximal proportion of the women was indicated in the category of working, culminating at nearly 40%. However, the purpose of visiting town witnessed the minimal statistic of the women, with merely 2%.
The most striking point is the yawning gap with respect to the number of two genders taking advantage of the car for different purposes. In the purpose of work saw the substantial gap, with 52% in men and 38% in women. Furthermore, the equivalence could be observed in the group of running errands and the bank, with 3% of men in both of which.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive 67
- The charts show the percentage of power generated from 6 different types in Gareline 69
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. 78
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, of course, by and large, on the contrary, with regard to, with respect to, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76649746193 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62668652087 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527918781726 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5941170816 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1111111111 5.23603664747 250% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127325669239 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567733950257 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774303536873 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963604989843 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778163383535 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.