The Bar Chart Below Shows The Numbers Of Men And Women Attending Various Evening Courses At An Adult Education Centre In The Year 2009. The Pie Chart Gives Information About The Ages Of These Course Participants?
In this infographic, there are 2 charts (a bar chart and a pie chart). The bar chart well compares the quantity of people participating by each selected evening courses at an adult education centre for 4 general courses (Drama, Painting, Sculpture, and Language), while the pie chart clearly illustrates the proportion of people to each age group.
In the given bar charts, it is evident that the pattern of attendances in Language was similar to that in Drama, in that the number of women accounted for the highest, or at 40 in Language and at 20 in the other. Meanwhile, their figures of men enlisting in Painting were almost equal to those in women, or at around 27% on average. On the other hand, it is interesting that the quantity of men participating in Sculpture accounts for the greatest at 10%, whilst that of women were relatively adjacent at 5.
In the given pie chart, it can be explained that all participants in 4 mentioned courses consists senior people, aged 50 years and above, or at 42% and people who were between 40 and 49 years (26%). Of all people in evening class, 16% was presented in age group between 30 and 39; 11% in 20-29 age group and only 5% in the rate of aged under 20 accounted for the lowest.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54054054054 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64362227611 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545045045045 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1738906557 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385062637867 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173004570136 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978891768877 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24887136756 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110711327311 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.