The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

The bar graph depicts the information of percentage of Australian male and female in varied age groups who did daily physical work in 2010.

As it is clear from the bar graph, that among the group of population between 15 to 24 years of age category, male preffered most to do physical work with 52.8% and seven percent less females were involved in physical excercise. In the following ten years, an opposite data was noticed, where less males with 42.2% were involved in the physical activities which is less of females by 6 percent. Furthermore,in the age group of 35 to 44 years, again the rate of males involved in physical work increased with similar to the males of group 15 to 24 years. Whereas, the percentile of females has declined to 39.5% in the age group 35 to 44 years which is relatively less of all the previous age groups.

Probing further, in the middle age group of 45 to 54 years, 53.3% females and 43.1% males were wittnessed to indulged in the daily physical workout. Further, in the next ten years, the data was almost similar with females but an additional two percent increase was noticed in case of males. Lastly, in the age group of 65 and above, the proportion of males and females involved in physical work becomes almost equal with a little difference of one percent between them.

Overall, males were found more actively involved in the year group 15 to 24 ,which further declined slowly to in comparision to females.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun females is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...sical work with 52.8% and seven percent less females were involved in physical excer...
^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun males is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rs, an opposite data was noticed, where less males with 42.2% were involved in the p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ess of females by 6 percent. Furthermore,in the age group of 35 to 44 years, again ...
^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...vely involved in the year group 15 to 24 ,which further declined slowly to in comp...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, lastly, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69921875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51406869076 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4765625 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.332429976 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212344573991 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113029949938 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955253398774 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168623749506 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115776477002 0.0819641961636 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.