The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides the information about the percentage of regular physical exercise taking male and female in six distinct age groups during the year 2010.
Overall, middle aged women are very eager to perform physical activities related work and only very young men show high interest for pursuing exercise. However, at the last age group both men and women are performed physical work in almost similar rate.
At the age group 45 to 54, exactly 53.5% of Australian women had been engaged in physical activity that was maximum in 2010, whereas for this group only 43.1% male interested to take regular physical work. Similarly, women were involved in daily physical work over fifty percent for the age groups 35 to 44 and 55 to 64 (about 52.5 and 53 percent respectively), while, in these age groups 39.5% and 45.1% men were engaged in daily physical activity. Likewise, for the age group 25 to 34, about 48.9% female and 42.2% male went to the physical exercise.
At very young group (15 to 24), maximum 52.8% male compared to 47.7% female taken the daily physical workout. Even in the old age group men and women were busy with physical labour.
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 39
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, similarly, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81909547739 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27110106623 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4535352388 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.875 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276643297847 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144325955532 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512601395708 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187807457992 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281840404383 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.