the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of U.K population consuming five parts of fruit and vegetable daily between 2001 and 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that, over the period as a whole, despite some fluctuations, the number of people having such a diet had increased. In addition to this, it was also noticed that the women under this category out numbered men and children.
At the beginning of the period, the percentage of female stood at just above 20, which was almost double the amount of children in that year. Following that, their proportion gradually increased, hitting a peak in 2006, accounting for over 30%, tapering off a little by the end of the period. During all these years, this category retained its top most position.
Children on the other hand, remained the lowest population falling under such category. Starting at a little above 10%, it remained stable for the next few years after which it's percentage rose slowly reaching a high of around 25% in the year 2007, ending the time frame in 2008 at a little less than 25%, being the lowest of that year. In addition, the graph of men followed a similar pattern, however it stood second throughout the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...r chart illustrates the proportion of U.K population consuming five parts of frui...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83902439024 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48136900672 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653658536585 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7627159737 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101954426617 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436215147548 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906344415275 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913734200204 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118541551957 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.