The bar chart provides information about the proportion of educational degree's gained by both men and women for the working age population in wales between the period of 2001 and 2002.
Overall, females were highly qualified in fields of post qraduation and GCSE grade A to C or equivalent compared to males who had graduate degrees and GCE A level or equivalent. In contrast to, huge number of males and females were not qualified while, females number of no qualifications was higher.
Males, had almost 15% of graduate degrees. Whilst, graduate females were slightly over one in ten. Higher education qualification among males was around 8%. Than, the figure showed sharp increase in qualification of males GCA level or equivalent almost at zenith. However, in GCSE grade A to C equivalent qualification in male counterparts decreased (18%). But, in other types of study males depicted rise. Also, in that period number of unqualified males were 20%.
Females were ranked higher in post graduation by almost 10% whereas, that scale lowered in terms of GCE A grade level or equivalent study than, males about 13%. While, females had highest grade in GCSE A to C or equivalent which was about a quarter. In other qualification females were lower than males by 1%. In comparison with no qualification, higher number(23%) of females were not qualified then males.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...ualification among males was around 8%. Than, the figure showed sharp increase in qu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...y than, males about 13%. While, females had highest grade in GCSE A to C or equivalent whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...females were lower than males by 1%. In comparison with no qualification, higher number23%...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09777777778 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85333333333 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6121644804 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9285714286 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0714285714 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919003564689 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363133207688 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588910860717 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826436682792 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866080154144 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.