The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart provides information about the ratio of annual visitors in three types of London Museums over the period from 2007 to 2012. Overall, it can be clearly seen that there was widely fluctuation in all three museums.
According to the chart, it is vividly shown that, in 2007, the National Gallery had the lowest attendance rate amongst all museums with nearly 5.3 millions visitors annually. However, from 2007 to 2012, National Gallery experienced an increase and reached a peak of approximately 15.2 million people in 2012. Regarding Victoria and Albert Museum, in 2007, it had nearly 14 million audience per year, but in the following years, the museum witnessed a steady fluctuation and ended at 10 million visitors annually.
On the other hand, at the beginning British Museum was the second popular museum with almost 13 million visitors. Although, the museum’s attendance plummeted till 2009. Starting from 2010, number of visitors sharply increased and finished at 13 million visitors per year in 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...museum with almost 13 million visitors. Although, the museum’s attendance plummeted till...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, second, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24848484848 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58011040403 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7190962281 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223340627012 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102594123209 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698515877513 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162561534948 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429681413634 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.