The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrate, the information of actual feel reported in survey for the lives in London over three years and line graph demonstrates the predominant problem to deal with. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, different kinds of shop and easy to get job makes up the best thing to live in London, Whereas, traffic congestion, cost of living and crime depicts the bad side of life in London. In addition litter was the most significant problem of people live there.
On the one hand, range of shops and job opportunities account for most significant priority of life in London such as, more than 40% and 35% respectively over three years. However, survey shows more than 35% saying mixture of people was good while less than 35 % reports which is worst thing in London. Likewise, people voted for transport, night life, museum and art gallery's approximately 20 to 25%.
Traffic congestion, cost of living and crime was the most considerable worst part of London people which is about more than 40% of other problems in given period. Cost of housing accounts for approximately 35% . Furthermore, Litter was the biggest problem which is 70% in first year, and climbed up to 75% in second year before falling to 68% by last year. Noise was the least problem affected with 58% which declined gradually to 52% in third year. However, air quality was relatively stable with slight decline trend 67% to 63% over three tears in London
Comments
good job
good job
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...icts the bad side of life in London. In addition litter was the most significant problem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the worst'.
Suggestion: is the worst
...good while less than 35 % reports which is worst thing in London. Likewise, people voted...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f housing accounts for approximately 35% . Furthermore, Litter was the biggest pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, second, third, whereas, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89430894309 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56740555424 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.049975025 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216975665631 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077412179281 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785842887917 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154317183413 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764001598584 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.