The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh

The bar graph illustrates the outcome of survey given by habitant of the London in three different year and the Line graph demonstrates major problems people who faced during their living in London. The scale is in percentage.

Overall, it can be observed that range of shops were best thing in London whereas, cost of living and traffic congestion worst things were living in London. Also, there was majority of problems of litter in living London faced by people.

To commence with, people who most satisfied with rang of shops were available London was above 40% in three years. Whereas, people thought that another best things in London were job opportunities and mixture of people accounted for nearly 35% for both. However, Museum and Art galleries, night life and transport were roughly accounted for best things was 25%.

On the other hand, cost of living and traffic congestion were worst things in London claimed for approximately 50% in three years. Moreover, crime was around 56% in first year which, declined in next years. However, mixture of people and cost of housing were accounted for above 30%.

Additionally, majority of problem faced by people was litter which was above 70%. While, least problem observed by noise below 60%. While, Air quality problem at moderator level account for 65% throughout the three years.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the best'.
Suggestion: were the best
... it can be observed that range of shops were best thing in London whereas, cost of living...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'congestion the worst'.
Suggestion: congestion the worst
...don whereas, cost of living and traffic congestion worst things were living in London. Also, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ught that another best things in London were job opportunities and mixture of people...
^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
..., cost of living and traffic congestion were worst things in London claimed for appr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the worst'.
Suggestion: were the worst
..., cost of living and traffic congestion were worst things in London claimed for approximat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... people was litter which was above 70%. While, least problem observed by noise below ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...le was litter which was above 70%. While, least problem observed by noise below 60%. Wh...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11312217195 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40171345372 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524886877828 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1250240961 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9230769231 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160590412004 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615457160062 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068410157169 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111158139628 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781076138351 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the best'.
Suggestion: were the best
... it can be observed that range of shops were best thing in London whereas, cost of living...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'congestion the worst'.
Suggestion: congestion the worst
...don whereas, cost of living and traffic congestion worst things were living in London. Also, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ught that another best things in London were job opportunities and mixture of people...
^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
..., cost of living and traffic congestion were worst things in London claimed for appr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the worst'.
Suggestion: were the worst
..., cost of living and traffic congestion were worst things in London claimed for approximat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... people was litter which was above 70%. While, least problem observed by noise below ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...le was litter which was above 70%. While, least problem observed by noise below 60%. Wh...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11312217195 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40171345372 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524886877828 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1250240961 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9230769231 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160590412004 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615457160062 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068410157169 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111158139628 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781076138351 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.