The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1994.
The given histograms charts reveals the information about marriage and divorce statistics by nine different countries during year 1981 to 1994. The data is calibrated in thousands. It is clearly and coherently representated.
Firstly, it can be seen that, in marriage statistics USA has maximum contribution than the other nations, it's contribution was approximately 11000 in 1981 and 1994. UK had second position in marriage statistics. After that, in Denmark, Japan and Finland, people had crossed to 6000. But France, Italyand Germany people contribution was less than 6000 in marriage statistics.
Furthermore, we can seen that in divorce statistics, minimum contribution of Italy from other nations, but in USA had maximum contribution in divorce statistics during the year 1981 and 1994. Besides, if we see in Japan, Germany, France, these nations had not crossed over 2000. After that, neither UK and nor be Denmark both contribution near about 3000.
Overall, it is evident that marriage statistics is more than the divorce statistics during the year 1981 and 1994
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be seen that, in marriage statistics USA has maximum contribution than the other ...
^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...iage statistics. Furthermore, we can seen that in divorce statistics, minimum con...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44047619048 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9692060904 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9828777641 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276571533374 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103863457039 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135407467188 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218149843965 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105463755367 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.68 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.