The bar charts illustrate the alterations and differences in the average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA.
The bar charts illustrate the alterations and differences in the average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA.
Overall, most unhealthy nutrients were consumed at dinner which contained the largest portion of sodium accounted for 43%, the second contribution was saturated fat about 37%.
Breakfast was likely to be the healthiest meal in a day due to all the smallest proportions of 3 nutrients were belong to the meal in the morning, at 14% to 16% daily average contributions. Meanwhile, Americans took a lot of sodium and saturated fats for lunch, about 29% and 26% respectively. And added sugar had a smaller portion in lunch at only 19%, while the largest added sugars consumption in the day were for snacks, accounted for a quarter of total added sugars consumed.
In conclusion, Americans ate breakfast with the less unhealthy nutrients while dinner was compounded with a significant amount of nutrients that harmful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...mallest proportions of 3 nutrients were belong to the meal in the morning, at 14% to 1...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19496855346 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95636288099 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559748427673 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9966473158 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.666666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410229534216 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243782873749 0.103423049105 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.341238529166 0.0843802449381 404% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328942502594 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.393775470283 0.0819641961636 480% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.