The bar diagram below shows the number of houses per year in 2 cities, Derby and Nottingham between 2000 and 2009.
The bar chart gives the information about, how many houses built in a year in Derby and Nottingham cities from 2000 to 2009. Overall, the significant number of constructions were took place in 2009 than earlier years.
It is clear from the graph that, in 2000, the number of houses in Nottingham was nearly 50, whereas 40 number of houses built-in Derby city. Since the number of houses in Derby saw an increasing trend most of the time, it overlapped by Nottingham in the first 2 years. During 2003, the construction increased gradually and then it remained constant for the next four decades before increasing to 350 number in 2009.
Although more number of houses built-in Nottingham in the first two years compared to Derby, it saw some fluctuations in the following years. In 2005, the number of houses were considerably increased which was 3 times higher that of the number in 2002. In contrast to Derby, the construction works were minimal during 2006 and 2008. However, the number surpassed in the year 2007 before increasing to 250 in 2009.
In conclusion, the highest number of houses built-in in the Derby city, while the least numbers were recorded in Nottingham except in 2000, 2001 and 2007.
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. Reasons and solutions 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend a large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both 73
- Below is a line char showing incidence of serious crime in a large UK city from December to November Total incidence of violent crime are shown in addition to incidence of 4 serious crime types 74
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgeys on expensive medical technology and procedures. This money should be spent instead on health education to keep people well. To what extent do you agree with this 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...ignificant number of constructions were took place in 2009 than earlier years. It...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89805825243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60853117937 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519417475728 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2642342359 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3494554956 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155477488537 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876926012176 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245919141034 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349960853047 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.