The bar chart gives information about research students by gender who took computer science courses at US tertiary in the year 2011.
Overall, it is clearly evident that, men were by far predominant in most of the courses in the university within the year. However, both gender studied natural sciences with equal proportion.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, as much as 200 males significantly studied mathematics and psychology with a mere 40 and 175 respectively for female learners. Similarly, 150 males were seen reading programming, but just half of that figure were found in this discipline for women. Additionally, engineering was no exception with few proportion for females at 90, whereas the opposite sex was relatively larger with students of 150.
With regards to research students learning languages, a little over 100 had shown willingness with approximate 80 males to take on linguistic. For learners reading natural sciences, the interest was notably mutual for both gender.
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 78
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun proportion seems to be countable; consider using: 'few proportions'.
Suggestion: few proportions
...ally, engineering was no exception with few proportion for females at 90, whereas the opposite...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3949044586 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92809413148 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.726114649682 0.547539520022 133% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6184064392 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166925242738 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717449178143 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734864503264 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11352949759 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823756890998 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.