The bar graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok.
The figure elucidates the number of holidaymakers to Thailand who visited several tourist destinations in Bangkok between 2014 and 2017. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the amount of tourist to China town.
To begin with, there were gradual palpitations for the total of sightseers to Bangkok zoo and sea world experienced. Initially, It stood at a half for Bangkok zoo and seven-tenths for sea world, and achieved approximately to a tenth and a fifth respectively by the end of the period shown.
In accordance with other tourist attractions, 2014 to 2016 witnessed a dramatic upsurge for the number of visitors to wax museum where it upright positioned at 45 in 2014 and peaked roughly to eight-tenths in 2016. Afterwards, it plummeted slightly to three-fourths in the next year. At first, china town also has the same pattern as wax museum from 2014, which made up at 2 of 10 , to 2016, which constituted for 100%. In contrast, it, erratically, plunged tremendously, dropping to a tenth in 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...seum from 2014, which made up at 2 of 10 , to 2016, which constituted for 100%. In...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07933578622 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3078717611 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930566067728 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458167370446 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714231925507 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812977072624 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755367655635 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.