The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016.
The bar graph compares the stock value of Facebook, Google, Apple and Yahoo over a period of six years.
Overall, there was a steady increase in Facebook's stock price while Yahoo's value decreased continuously in the given period. It is also noticeable that the stock price of Google remained relatively stable as compared to Apple, which displayed an unstable trend.
In 2011, Facebook's value began at around 7,000 and the number grew up steadily in the following years to reach a peak of about 10,000 in 2016., which was the highest value among the three companies. By contrast, the stock price of Yahoo declined year on year from approximately 7,000 in 2011 to roughly 3,000 in 2016.
With regard to Google, the stock price remained the lowest figure throughout the period. at almost 1,000. The stock market valuation of Apple was just under 5,000 at the beginning of the period and rocketed to roughly 35,000 in 2012. The figure fluctuated in the following years before ending to just below 5,000 in 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...he lowest figure throughout the period. at almost 1,000. The stock market valuatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95348837209 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40163433627 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7791261937 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194250039262 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857618403146 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538089517287 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120857788603 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170820962799 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.