The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.

The bar chart gives the information about sales of four different kinds of digital games around the world over a 6-year period.

It is clear that sales of handheld games were highest among these four categories, namely mobile phone games, online games, console games and handheld games between 2000 and 2006. While figures for console games fell steadily during the same period.

In 2000, worldwide sales of handheld games stood at around 11 billion dollars, while console games earned just around 6 billion. The next 6-year saw an increase in sales of handheld games, reached around 18 billion dollars in 2006. On contrary, the figure for consoles games smoothly fell by about 4 billion until 2006.

It is noticeable that figures for mobile phone games and onlion games are not included in 2000. But there was a increasement in sales of mobile phone games, from only around 2 billion dollars in 2002 to 7 billion in 2006. The similar phenomenon occurred in the figure for online games, in 2001, it earned only 1 billion dollars, achieving 9 billion in 2006, which is also 2 billion higher than mobile phone games.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fell steadily during the same period. In 2000, worldwide sales of handheld gam...
^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...are not included in 2000. But there was a increasement in sales of mobile phone g...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91578947368 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25933581788 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3553881804 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331969636207 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156700522075 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518136399155 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214359377316 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027989681591 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.