The bar chart gives information about the sales spent in the world of variety of digital games from 2000 to 2006. Overall, it is clearly seen that the highest sales was handheld types whereas the lowest was the online games.
Looking into the data in more detail, the sales volume of handheld in 2000 was almost $12 billion. Fortunately, its amount continuously rose in the upcoming years and finally reached the peak to just $18 billion in 2006. In contrast, the console games saw to be dropping from 2000, of nearly $6 billion into around $3 billion in the year 2006.
In looking to mobile and online games, both of the sales steadily rose during the years. It was likely to be almost the same amount in both 2002 and 2004, which valued for only $1 billion and $4 billion respectively. Finally, the least sales seem to be mobile phone games, which got just more than $7 million in 2006.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... saw to be dropping from 2000, of nearly billion into around billion in the year...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...aw to be dropping from 2000, of nearly billion into around billion in the year 2006. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 2000, of nearly billion into around billion in the year 2006. In looking t...
^^
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth 2002 and 2004, which valued for only billion and billion respectively. Final...
^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2004, which valued for only billion and billion respectively. Finally, the least...
^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...04, which valued for only billion and billion respectively. Finally, the least sales ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le phone games, which got just more than million in 2006.
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... phone games, which got just more than million in 2006.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65161290323 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21897971323 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 11.8262155823 43.030603864 27% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.125 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270708314541 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118791548106 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743579053816 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187336595355 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623209584088 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.