Below is a line graph showing the incidence of mental illness as indicated by receipt of incapacity benefit amongst older UK males, from 1971 -2015. The reform in the benefits system took place in 1995.
The line graph depicts the percentage of mental illnes as indicated by incapacity benefit in the elderly males in the United Kingdom between 1971 to 2015. Overall, the 1995 reform brought a gradual decreasing in the incapacity benefit receipt.
It is clear from the graph that, in 1970, there are around 2.5% of mental illness accounted in the 65-69 age group. With regards to 60-64 males in UK was reported five times higher incidence that of 55-59 group in 1970. Then it constantly rose to just over 6% in the year 80, but it surpassed than 55-59 group and peaked at a level of 20% in the 1995 reform before declining to almost nothing in 2000.
Talking about 55-59 age group, the percentage of mental illness increased significantly and rocketed at a level of 20% which is almost similar to 65-69, then this steadily dropped after 1995 reform. Although 60-64 group experienced some fluctuations before reaching the highest incapacity benefits during reform, it came down to below 20% in 2015 after some ups and downs.
In conclusion, since the older UK males incidence of mental illness was high, it was significantly declined after the 1995 reform. The highest changes was noticed among the 65- 69 age group.
- The line graph gives information about how people in the united kingdom spend their income 83
- The maps show the changes in the Denham town in the year 1986 and to the present 56
- Some people say that economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stopped immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sidesand give your opinion. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 84
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91304347826 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49932661472 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8459705766 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298621547951 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130767242631 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929068572508 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196877874819 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108408264518 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.