Birth rate
The graph presents comparison of birth rates of the two most largest population countries, China and
USA, which occurred between 1920 and 2000. Birth rates indicates the number of births per thousand
of population a year.
Mainly, USA had higher birth rates than china during that period given, except in 1930 - 1935 and
1945 - 1957. in the beginning of period, USA had birth rates of approximately 12 while china had 10 -
slightly lower than USA. In the next years, either USA or China, had fluctuation of birth rates until
1950, in which both of them had the highest birth rates of 15 and 20 for USA and China, respectively.
Additionally, years after 1950 birth rates of USA and China were decreasing steadily until the end of
2000, except in 1955 when China had dramatically drop of birth rates from 20 to 8 in only five years.
Meanwhile birth rates of USA remained to dip continuously through years. Finally this figure shows
that USA had birth rate of roughly 7 whilst china had the lowest point of birth rates in range of 2 - 3 in
2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'largest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: largest
...ts comparison of birth rates of the two most largest population countries, China and USA, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the largest'.
Suggestion: most the largest
...ts comparison of birth rates of the two most largest population countries, China and USA, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...except in 1930 - 1935 and 1945 - 1957. in the beginning of period, USA had birth ...
^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'dropped'.
Suggestion: dropped
...ept in 1955 when China had dramatically drop of birth rates from 20 to 8 in only fiv...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...rates from 20 to 8 in only five years. Meanwhile birth rates of USA remained to dip cont...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 73, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ined to dip continuously through years. Finally this figure shows that USA had birth r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72972972973 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46586959582 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0950983292 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.538268673659 0.215688989381 250% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.34972735604 0.103423049105 338% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938015020045 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289986149916 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119976499742 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.