British households by vehicle ownership
The graph illustrates data with regard to the ownership of vehicles by people lived in Great Britain between 1976 and 2000.
Overall, the proportion of people who possesed one and two vehicles declined, but two remained categories( 0 along with 3 vehicles) rose over the span of 40 years.
Looking more closely at the details, in 1960 60% of the British people owned a single car. However, after 20 years this index narrowed to 36% and it continued steadily until 2000. The figures for people possesed two vehicles gradually increased in contrast to former group. To be specific, it reached merely 40%, and then took the lead in the year 2000.
Additionally, solely three per cent of the households had three cars in 1960. After a decade it constituted five per cent. In 1980, it grew threefold, then it stedied. The percentage of people who did not own any vehicle made up just under 20% . It slowly decreased to ten per cent over the course of four decades.
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- Some people say that spending time to develop a successful career is the most important thing Others say that spending time with friends and family is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 68
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- Average daily milk beverage product consumption among adult age groups in Canada in milliliters 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates data with regard t...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Great Britain between 1976 and 2000. Overall, the proportion of people who po...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hicles rose over the span of 40 years. Looking more closely at the details, in ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d then took the lead in the year 2000. Additionally, solely three per cent of t...
^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the households had three cars in 1960. After a decade it constituted five per cent. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t own any vehicle made up just under 20% . It slowly decreased to ten per cent ove...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, then, in contrast, in contrast to, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49781249487 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672619047619 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8028534506 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202681534737 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054495115538 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545841098955 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109516599675 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333180464467 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.