Contained in the table provided data pertaining to the proportion of consumer spending in five nations in 2002. Overall, the total proportion of expenditure on food, drinks and tobacco was the highest among three given categories, while the total percentage of spending on leisure and education was the lowest.
Regarding food, drinks and tobacco, one sees a noteworthy amount of spending on these items. It is clear that Turkey and Ireland spent the largest amount of money on food, drinks and tobacco, with figures of 32.14% and 28.91%, respectively. However, consumers in Spain, Sweden and Italy spent a moderate amount of money on these items, which made up 18.8%, 16.36% and 15.77%, in that same order.
Turning to clothing and footwear, there was a modest amount of budget spent on these items. Apparently, Italian spent 9% of their budget on clothing and footwear, making Italy became the country had the highest rate of clothing and footwear spending. Nevertheless, the average proportion of clothing and footwear spending in Ireland, Spain and Turkey was just around 6.5%, whereas Sweden's proportion in this categories was just only 5.4%.
Finally, in regards to leisure and education, the average amount of spending was very miniscule. The proportion of Turkey was the highest of all, as it reached 4.35%, while the average proportion of the remaining nations was between 1.98% and 3.22% only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...und 6.5%, whereas Swedens proportion in this categories was just only 5.4%. Final...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...egories was just only 5.4%. Finally, in regards to leisure and education, the average amou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, however, nevertheless, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22466960352 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60319996192 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511013215859 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2892745974 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0621355453583 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329881096839 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471301854947 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0421960368769 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328336131074 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.