Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009
The table compares the number of cars produced in three countries between 2003 and 2009.
Overall, it is clear that Thailand manufactured the highest number of cars throughout the period. However, Australia was the only country which saw a steady increase in car production in each of the years shown in the table.
In 2003, Australia produced 200,000 cars, half the number manufactured in Argentina. Production in Thailand stood at 700,000 cars. Production then saw a significant increase to almost 1,120,000 in Thailand in 2005, while in that year car manufacture doubled in Australia. In contrast, the number of cars made in Argentina fell dramatically to 200,000.
Car production in Argentina continued to decline, falling to about 160,000 by 2009. A fall in manufacturing from 2005 was also witnessed in Thailand where the figure fell to just under 1 million at the end of the period, although Thailand remained the major car producer. However, the steady rise in car production continued in Australia, reaching a peak of 600,000 in 2009
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-28 | ledinhphong | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | Dung nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | Dung nguyen | 79 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent byBritish parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014.The second chart shows the number of children who participated inthree sports in Britain over the same time period. 78
- The responsibility for the protection of the environment is by the transnational organization or every country 92
- Environment and solutions 89
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table compares the percentage of students who attended four different types of secondary schools in 2000, 2005, 2009. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15294117647 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88775004909 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3095162124 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252373911947 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114071653971 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112800997268 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201977279458 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138019512716 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.