changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK
The graph shows the pattern percentages of access to modern technology in homes throughout 7 years. It is obvious that modern technology has developed.
In 1996 mobile phone access was the lowest with under 20%, while now it is one of the highest access percentages. So, it has increased a lot in 7 years. Also, the internet, which was not even accessible in 1996, started to have access with a low percentage such as approximately 10% in 1998. Then it has decreased by twice at the end of 2003. Nevertheless, it still has the lowest access percentage in 2003.
Even though cd player, which was the most accessible device in 1996, has only increased by about 10% in 7 years, it still has the highest access percentage. Last but not least home computer access rose from 29% to 57% in those years.
The overall picture is that all of the technology access percentages have decreased at least 10% in seven years. Which shows that technology was developing fast between 1996-2003 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | Nguyên-MTTN | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | Vinty | 79 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Phan Quang Tuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | ducmap03 | 11 | view |
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world Why do you think it s important to do so What will be the effect if children are not taught history 61
- The table below shows the figures in thousand for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 73
- Prevention is better than cure Out of a country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures 61
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 78
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...the highest access percentage. Last but not least home computer access rose from 29% to 5...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e years. The overall picture is that all of the technology access percentages have decr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... decreased at least 10% in seven years. Which shows that technology was developing fa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nevertheless, so, still, then, while, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80116959064 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69461856059 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5996883878 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6363636364 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277429881583 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123581474083 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115559627376 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21472438948 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147390818728 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.