The gathered information in the table is about life expectancy in 3 countries and the amount of money each country spends on the health care system. On the other hand, the chart furnishes data about the number of hospital beds per thousand of folks in some developed countries.
According to the table, Japan has the most range of life expectancy among the mentioned countries in the table. However, this Asian country has spent lesser dollars for each person. On the contrary, the US has less life expectancy, by spending about 3 times more than Japan on the health system.
On the other hand, the chart enlights the reasons for Japan's high rate of life expectancy. While the US has less than 4 beds in a hospital per 1000 citizens, Japan afforded 14 beds for each 1000 Japanese.
Obviously, the rate of life expectancy is more related to the money each government has spent on building hospitals than any other spending mechanism. For instance, the Netherlands provided more than 4 beds per thousand of population and reached to the number of 80 in the average life expectancy, while the US beds in hospitals are below than 4 per 1000 which causes to less life expectancy.
- Which would you choose: a high-paying job with long hours that would give you little time with family and friends or a lower-paying job with shorter hours that would give you more time with family and friends? 70
- What do you want most in a friend someone who is intelligent or someone who has a sense of humor or someone who is reliable Which one of these characteristics is most important to you Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice 73
- TPO41 83
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Games are as important for adults as they are for children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOPIC # 56 A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77450980392 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57128286632 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46568627451 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3124120099 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216230707071 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104107326271 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088025641485 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151153944276 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920994034479 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.