Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, e-mail, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
there is no evidence about the exact time that human started to send letters, actually, it is the first step of the communication from long distances. currently, new technologies affected people hugely, they use telecommunication services more than any time. I believe, still, face-to-face communication is the best way to interact with others. there are several reasons that support my position as mentioned in the following essay.
first of all, in the presence of a person, you can act like an actor, use your body language and try to influence them by many options available. people need to see your mimic to belive your trustworthy. my personal experience is a compelling example of this, I started to meet a girl by Skype last year, we were in love for more than 6 months, everything was nice for both of us during that time. consequently, we managed for a meeting, that was a disaster! she wasn't the same person, I believe, I couldn't continue my relationship with here because of the energy that I received in her presence.
Secondly, new technologies have advantages and disadvantages for the people who are using them, but one the chief side effects of them is the increase of misunderstandings between two individual, which looks not easy to avoid. For instance, when I call a friend I can't tell the real feelings of mine, because I suppose he/she can't find them as they really are. to give another example of this fact, a recent research opposed that there are more inconvenient situations for the people who are addicted to using telecommunication than the people who use traditional ways of seeing and speak to others.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that face-to-face communication is more reliable than any other kind of interaction, this is because of usage of body language and because of abnormal misunderstandings in using other types of communications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is no evidence about the exact time tha...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Currently
... the communication from long distances. currently, new technologies affected people hugel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...s the best way to interact with others. there are several reasons that support my pos...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... as mentioned in the following essay. first of all, in the presence of a person, yo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...fluence them by many options available. people need to see your mimic to belive your t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
... your mimic to belive your trustworthy. my personal experience is a compelling exa...
^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...s nice for both of us during that time. consequently, we managed for a meeting, that was a d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ged for a meeting, that was a disaster! she wasnt the same person, I believe, I cou...
^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...for a meeting, that was a disaster! she wasnt the same person, I believe, I couldnt c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...she wasnt the same person, I believe, I couldnt continue my relationship with here beca...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...d. For instance, when I call a friend I cant tell the real feelings of mine, because...
^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...lings of mine, because I suppose he/she cant find them as they really are. to give a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'cants'.
Suggestion: cants
...lings of mine, because I suppose he/she cant find them as they really are. to give a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
.../she cant find them as they really are. to give another example of this fact, a re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, look, really, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i suppose, kind of, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92744479495 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1446563338 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7725723954 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.45110844103 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187915253359 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07142128493 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638873271068 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12744517219 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737999411328 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.