The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The line graph compares how many cars that each household can own in America during a 30-year period, starting from 1975.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of families having two cars and three cars increased between 1975 and 2005, while the opposite trend was true for that of having no car. Also, the figure for household owning one car had no change after 30 years, although fluctuation.
Looking at the chart for more details, although the household having two cars and three cars were similar in terms of a general upward trend, the proportion of household with two cars in all years shown was higher than that of three cars. Starting at about 7.5%, the proportion of household having two cars tripled that of three cars. In the next years, both objects continue to increase steadily to approximately 10% and 18% in 2005, respectively.
By contrast, there was a significant decrease of 20% in the number of households with no car in 1985, which was followed by going down gradually to 22% in 2005. Besides, although the year 1985 witnessed a sharp fluctuation at 37%, the percentage of families with one car remained stable at the highest point (exactly 45%) after 30 years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 73
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8243902439 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52037975288 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2532093481 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222315693419 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105585511333 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477364104035 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142506633887 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346282482214 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.