The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2005 2015 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates someland’s main exports three different products meat, dairy, international tourism in the years 2005, 2015 and 2025.

Overall, tourism was the highest export product in 2005, dairy products was the highest export products in someland’s in resent time but in future it will go down, international truism take over and got the highest amount of money. It is clear that over the time meat products exports will be decreased than 2005 level.

According to the bar chat, international tourism was the highest point at 2005 it got almost 6.2 billion USD. Over the time it increases in 2015 it was approximately 6.8 billion and in future it will be raised at almost 8 billion USD. But dairy products was climbed most in 2005 to 2015 almost 3 billion, in 2005 it was 5 billion and 2015 it was almost 8 billion, but in 2025 it will be reduced a little (approximately 0.5 billion).

In the case of meat products, it declined over the time period in 2005 it was 4 billion and it decreased chronologically in 2015 it was 3.5 billion, in future 2015 it will be 3 billion.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (66 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...and's main exports three different products meat, dairy, international tourism in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urism in the years 2005, 2015 and 2025. Overall, tourism was the highest export ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llion, in 2005 it was 5 billion and 2015 it was almost 8 billion, but in 2025 it ...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, in future 2015 it will be 3 billion.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73575129534 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85553814483 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424870466321 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1237504385 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.571428571 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141007782313 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888392856802 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688375661754 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121722501001 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750710114397 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.