The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration provides facts on the portion of British people alloting funds to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 respectively. The percentage used is incremental of 5%, while the age groups were expressed in years of age.
To begin with, in 1990, people in the 36 to 50 age bracket have provide portion of their money the highest at approximately at 43% in that year. Secondly, the folks belonging to the age groups of 26 to 35 years old, and 51 years to senior citizens have all contributed approximately 30% to 35% of their total income to charitable institutions. Lastly, persons from the youngest group, 18 years to 25 years old, gave a shade above 15/100 of total monies earned by that same period.
Moving on, after 30 years, the age groups of 51 years to senior citizens exhibited an upward trend in terms of giving money to charity, with 40% for the group 51 years to 65 years, and 35% for people more than 65, exhibiting an average 3% to 5% increase. By zolo, both age groups, 26 to 35 and 36 to 50, exhibited a 5% decrease in comparison to the percentage given 10 years ago. Lastly, the youngest of all age groups, alloted the least with approximately 6%.
In summary, by zolo, age groups of 51- 65 and senior citizens showed an increase of contrebutions by an average of 3% to 5%. While on the other hand the rest of the groups decreased, with the 18-25 years bracket, exhibiting the most decline of 12/100.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bracket' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'brackets'.
Suggestion: brackets
...th, in 1990, people in the 36 to 50 age bracket have provide portion of their money the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...people in the 36 to 50 age bracket have provide portion of their money the highest at a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, in summary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54406130268 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64448319133 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509578544061 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7268268377 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200792353164 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913563936302 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070693811128 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140765955018 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086622700339 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.