The given bar chart compares the rates of the British people who gave money to the charity in five different age group in1990 and 2010.General speaking, there was an upward trend in all the age group over 50 years old, meanwhiles this figure in younger age groups increased in donating for charity.from 1990 to 2000.
It is obvious that the percentage of people in the age group 18 to 25 making donations remained the lowest in both years and fell drastically from 17 percent to just 7 percent during this period. There was a slight decreased of 26 to 35 age group contributors dby more than six percent and those of 36 to 50 age declined marginally by a similar number.
On the other hand, the percentage of people between 51 to 65 years were the second largest group in 1990 and rose to prominence in 2010. While those above 65 years of age were the third largest group in 1990, they were equal to the 36 to 50 age group in 2010.
While the percentage of donors increase till age group 36 to 51 in 1990 and declined thereafter, the contributors increased consistently till the age group 51 to 65 in 2010 and then declined.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chart compares the rates of the British people who gave money to the charity in ...
^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: General
...ive different age group in1990 and 2010.General speaking, there was an upward trend in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his period. There was a slight decreased of 26 to 35 age group contributors dby m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49514563107 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55513249078 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1655844065 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.333333333 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187489253414 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107184289774 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418978694687 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124558934681 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366396590044 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.