The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The chart indicates the proportion of British people who donated money to charity by five multiple age ranges in two years 1990 and 2010.
As can be seen from the chart, people between the ages of 36 and 50 donated the most money in 1990, and donors from 18 to 25 in 2010 raised the least amount. There were several notable fluctuations in two years. Similarly, the ages in 1990 raised more money than those in 2010 except for people from 51 to 65 and above 65, yet not much difference.
Specifically, in 1990, there was an upward trend in donating money to charity among ages. There are more than 15% of people between 18 and 25 and peaked more 40% with those from 36 to 50. Nevertheless, the ratio gradually declined to more than 30%.
Moreover, in 2010, there was a rapid growth in raising money voluntarily in the age group from 18 to 65. Although philanthropists aged above 65 raised less than those who donated most, it was not significant. There was only approximately 5% (between about 40% and 35%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The chart indicates the proportion of British people who donated money to char...
^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om the chart, people between the ages of 36 and 50 donated the most money in 1990...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here are more than 15% of people between 18 and 25 and peaked more 40% with thos...
^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e than 15% of people between 18 and 25 and peaked more 40% with those from 36 t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56593406593 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52403612544 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2806067624 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171732902696 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073641315582 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820474621862 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1150145652 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09367853576 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.