The bar graph depicts the data of donation by Britishers under different categories of age pur the years 1990 and 2010. The slot of age and percentage are given x-axis and y-axis respectively.
It is clearly seen that most of British philanthropist were fall under the age of 36-50 in year 1990. This age group people were on the top list of donating money whereas the least number of patron belongs to 18-25 age group with only 16%. However, this youth belongs to 26-35 age and senior citizens above 65 contributed equally with almost 31% in the year 1990 and the age group of 51-65 given slightly more than 65 age category people.
In 2010, the highest position of money donors occupied by 51-65 age group of Britishers. In addition, the youngest age group (18-25) had the lowest proportions of people donating money. A Those people in the category 36-50 and over 65 age came second with 35% for charity. There was also a decline in that of British Citizens between 26 to 35 years old in 2010.
It is clear from the observed data that young British people are less likely to give charity in both the years. But the people in their late fifties participate enormously in money donation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...een that most of British philanthropist were fall under the age of 36-50 in year 19...
^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h philanthropist were fall under the age of 36-50 in year 1990. This age group pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.663507109 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37916580118 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563981042654 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0621697042 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229934551154 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958360147557 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262448949295 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149906340087 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121180865431 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.