The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990and 2010
The bar graph demonstrates the ratio of british citizens' contributions to charity based on their age in both years from 1990 to 2010.
Overall,more British gave money to charity in 1990 than they did in 2010.However,people over 50 years old did just the opposite and a fewer younger British donated to charity than the adults did both in these years.
In 1990,42%British between the age of 36and 50 donated to charity and this ratio was the highest.In contrast,only around 17% youth from 18-25 age group contributed the philanthropy works which was the lowest.After two decades both these percentages declined significantly 35% and 7% respectively.
Turning to 2010,it is revealed that the percentage of british people who donate money.A similar trend can be observed for the next age group and hit its peak at about 40%for those aged 51to 65. In contrary,an opposing trend can be seen in the last age group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | gulialiwerovna | 61 | view |
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 78
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , more
...n both years from 1990 to 2010. Overall,more British gave money to charity in 1990 t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...o charity in 1990 than they did in 2010.However,people over 50 years old did just the o...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
...ty in 1990 than they did in 2010.However,people over 50 years old did just the opposite...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... charity and this ratio was the highest.In contrast,only around 17% youth from 18-...
^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , only
...d this ratio was the highest.In contrast,only around 17% youth from 18-25 age group c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...philanthropy works which was the lowest.After two decades both these percentages decl...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...tage of british people who donate money.A similar trend can be observed for the n...
^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , an
...t 40%for those aged 51to 65. In contrary,an opposing trend can be seen in the last ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05298013245 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08381805151 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649006622517 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1214439191 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.6 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269110423712 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140867842721 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637837784165 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158713452207 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349606105789 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.