The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compares the proportion of British citizen who donating to charity by the range of age between 1990 and 2010.
It is clear to see that offering financial support to charity is most popular for people aged from 36 to 50 in 1990, while in 2010, most of people giving donation are from 51 to 60.
In both of the years 1990 and 2010, people in the age group of 18 to 25 contributed to least in giving to charity, just approximately 17 percent in 1990 and nearly seven percent in 2010. More and more people are tended to giving money to charity when they are older. The year 1990 saw the age group of from 36 to 50 had the highest amount of people who gave money to charity, about 42 percent. The older age groups contributed a gradually less number, nearly 32 percent for people who over 65 years old.
In 2010, the highest number of people giving donation are from the age group of 51 to 65, with approximately 40 percent. People from 36 to 50 and people who are 65 and more are the second group with the most number citizen offering financial support to charity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The charts compares the proportion of British citizen who d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...d from 36 to 50 in 1990, while in 2010, most of people giving donation are from 51 to 60. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ercent. People from 36 to 50 and people who are 65 and more are the second group with t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'number' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: number
... and more are the second group with the most number citizen offering financial support to c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37810945274 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27644425814 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437810945274 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6152402193 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263639936537 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143600404547 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533879366359 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18497235675 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498577542203 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.