The chart below show the comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years
The two pie charts illustrate how different kind of energy production of France percentage wise in the years 1995 and 2005.
Overall, at the beginning of the period other fragment contributed the least to the energy production of France, while coal was the most significant part. In comparison, at the end of the period coal remains the largest energy production and the most negative trend was other segment.
Other sector accounted for 4.90% of energy production in 1995, and experienced a less than twofold increase to 9.10% in 2005. Energy production income from coal was 29.80% in 1995 and had a slight growth of 1.13% in 2005. At the beginning of the period, gas and nuclear services made up 29.63% and 6.40% of France energy production respectively, and these figures rose to 30.31% and 10.10% in 2005.
In the other hand, in 1995 petro got 29.27% which the third highest categories and fell to 19.55% in 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92993630573 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56179262462 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541401273885 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5438798133 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.571428571 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266891513705 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135484064854 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137245430547 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179962502718 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169660223144 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.