The chart below show the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of females and males attending five different university levels in Australia in the year of 1999.

Overall, the number of men doing a post-school qualification is more than women, while it is remarkable that the number of males having a skilled vocational diploma is significantly higher than females, while women are more likely to pursue an undergraduate diploma or bachelor's degree than men.

Speaking of skilled vocational diploma, men dominate this level with above 90% compared to about 10% of women. In terms of postgraduate diploma, about 1 third are women, and the rest are men, another level where males represent the majority, is the master's degree where 60% of the students are males, and about 40% are females.

The post-school qualifications where women are the majority are the undergraduate diploma, which is about 75% are females, and the bachelor's degree where females are about 7% more than males.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while, speaking of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23870967742 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87252585483 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5073639207 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.4 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198618094821 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118080418322 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252921451495 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130561947145 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176860822946 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.