The table gives information about the number of people visited Ashdown museum in the year before the renovation of the museum and the year after it, while the pie charts illustrate the outcome of a questionnaire about visitors' satisfaction during the same two periods.
Overall, the total number of visitors to the Ashdown museum increased significantly from 74000 before refurbishment to 92000 after it. However, the effect of this refurbishment on visitors can be seen clearly throughout the results of the survey, as the proportion of people who were satisfied or very satisfied jump up from 45% in the first period to 75 in the second one.
During the first period, Ashdown museum received 74000 visitors. Then, after renewing it, that number increased by 18000 person.
Speaking of the effect of refurbishment on visitors' satisfaction, 40% of visitors were dissatisfied and 10% very dissatisfied about the museum, after the renovation, these proportions decline to only 15% and 5% respectively. On the contrary, from only 30% and 15% between satisfied and very satisfied in the first period to 35% and 40% in the second period respectively. However, 5% refused to answer the survey in both periods
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...wing it, that number increased by 18000 person. Speaking of the effect of refurbish...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...aking of the effect of refurbishment on visitors satisfaction, 40% of visitors were diss...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed to answer the survey in both periods
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, while, speaking of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25641025641 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95034514746 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0140612643 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32570497773 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133466396923 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105293524394 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205975688351 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10661161047 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.