The bar chart arbitrarily displays the number of Japanese travellers leaving their country to go overseas, all within the years 1985 to 1995 and all displayed as millions. Moreover, the second infographic illustrates Australia's share of the Japanese tourism industry, shown in the form of a line graph.
As indicated in the bar chart, the years preceding 1990 had low figures; 1985 had the lowest figure on record for people travelling abroad in comparison to the following 10 years (the number of tourists being well under 6 million). In 1990, the number of passengers gradually increases at a rate of approximately 10 million people per annum. However, 1991 saw a slight decline in the number of passengers, averaging roughly 4.3 million tourists. The proportion of globe-trotters peaks in 1995; the passenger count between the range of 14 to 16 million.
This information can be portrayed in a slightly more exaggerated visual manner, although still displaying the exact same data. It arbitrarily demonstrates Australia's share of Japan's Tourism industry which reaches its apex in the year 1994. The percentage presents itself at a modest rate of just slightly above 6%. However, in the following year, 1995, the depression in the graph is indicative of a small decline, landing at exactly 6%. Moreover, during a four-year time frame (from 1985 to 1989), the pattern of the graph gradually increases. The year directly preceding 1990, the rate of tourism plummets significantly, making it the first anomaly. Later, in 1991, the percentile of shares rises to an estimate of the same rate as before the anomaly. From thereon, the rates subsequentially increase.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07522123894 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82434359657 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570796460177 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9394767884 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2307692308 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191976065165 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704939872548 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754832408977 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16821243913 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115668566254 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.