The chart below show the proportion of holidaymakers using three diffrent types of in three diffrent years

Essay topics:

The chart below show the proportion of holidaymakers using three diffrent types of in three diffrent years.

The data regarding the ratio of visitors using three separate kinds of accomodation in three distinct years 1988, 1998 and 2008 is depict by the given pie charts.
Overall, the presentation it is clear that the maximum holidaymakers preferred to stay with family and friends. However, the uncausal feature that cannot be ignored that minimum travellers intrested in camping.
Having a cast fleeting glance, it is cleared that in 1998, the most of the holidaymakers favoured to stay with family and friends to 67% and followed by hostels with 26% and carried by camping with 7%. The proportion of visitors were three-fifth who preferred to stay with family and friends in 1998. In 1998, percentage of travellers who stayed in hostels were more as compared to camping by 17%.
Turing to third pie chart, in 2008, around half holidaymakers were witnessed in hostels. In the same year the proportion of travellers who favoured camping was less than those who intrested to stay with family and friends which was 14% and 38% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depicted'.
Suggestion: depicted
...e distinct years 1988, 1998 and 2008 is depict by the given pie charts. Overall, the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...vellers who stayed in hostels were more as compared to camping by 17%. Turing to...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76604909256 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9960935592 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142371104253 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654985799295 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063545050071 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954593565151 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632134430587 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depicted'.
Suggestion: depicted
...e distinct years 1988, 1998 and 2008 is depict by the given pie charts. Overall, the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...vellers who stayed in hostels were more as compared to camping by 17%. Turing to...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76604909256 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9960935592 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142371104253 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654985799295 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063545050071 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954593565151 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632134430587 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.