The bar chart illustrates the quantity of free time loved by men and women of various employment status (employed(full time), employed(part-time), unemployed, retired and housewives) between 1998 and 1999. Units are measured in hours. Overall, unemployed men enjoy more free time than women in the period given. Both male and female have more time off namely the unemployed whereas the least amount of leisure time loved by male and female (employed (part-time) and housewives and employed (full time) respectively).
In terms of unemployed people, the men had more time off than women (around 85 and 78 hours weekly respectively). The employed male who had a full time programme enjoyed about 45 hours in a week as opposed to the employed female around 38 hours. Approximately 85 hours were enjoyed retired men which was slightly more than retired women who enjoyed just under 80 hours.
On the other hand, the quantity of free time liked by male and female on the remaining employment's categories was higher at women's group. There was also a high difference in part-time employed people's number of hours with female numbering exactly 40 hours in a week, compared to men, who had not free time. The women had also more leisure time than men in housewives, exactly 50 hours once every seven days while the men didn't enjoy free time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...d part-time and housewives and employed full time respectively. In terms of unemployed p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...spectively. The employed male who had a full time programme enjoyed about 45 hours in a w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...urs once every seven days while the men didnt enjoy free time.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93273542601 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64746466545 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502242152466 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6387953117 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241578845703 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115427434053 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530497325232 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184269461862 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406668210622 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.