A glance at the bar chart provided reveals how much money spent on week for different fast foods in UK during the period from 1970 to 1990.Overall,what stands out from chart is that hamburgers were the most popular fast food among highincome earners than other products.Another interesting point is that hamburger and fish trend were similat to each other.
Looking at the details, as regards bar chart hamburgers with 70 were twice as popular as fish with 25 among high income people while pizza was the least popular food with above 20 . By contrast, among average income earners fish with 45 were a bit less popular than hamburgers whereas pizza accounted for 25 percent. Meanwhile, fish were the popular food among low income people with aroud 25 percent while hamburgers numbered a just 20 percent .Pizza accounted for 15 percent , which made it the least opted food.
Secondly, according to graph, in 1970 fish trend started at approximately 15 then rose gradually to 500 until 1990 while hamburger increased from above 7 experienced slightly rise to 100 next 15 year before rocketing to 300 in 1990.Next pizza witnessed steady decline from 300 to 200 over 10 year then saw a bit rise just 204 in 1990.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...glance at the bar chart provided reveals how much money spent on week for differe...
^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
... UK during the period from 1970 to 1990.Overall,what stands out from chart is that hamb...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , what
...ing the period from 1970 to 1990.Overall,what stands out from chart is that hamburger...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
... highincome earners than other products.Another interesting point is that hamburger an...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oducts.Another interesting point is that hamburger and fish trend were similat t...
^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... point is that hamburger and fish trend were similat to each other. Looking at ...
^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...was the least popular food with above 20 . By contrast, among average income earne...
^^
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...le hamburgers numbered a just 20 percent .Pizza accounted for 15 percent , which m...
^^
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Pizza
... hamburgers numbered a just 20 percent .Pizza accounted for 15 percent , which made i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... percent .Pizza accounted for 15 percent , which made it the least opted food. Se...
^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 fish trend started at approximately 15 then rose gradually to 500 until 1990 wh...
^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Next
...15 year before rocketing to 300 in 1990.Next pizza witnessed steady decline from 300...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, secondly, then, whereas, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86893203883 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64294986458 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597087378641 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.1569402795 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.6 112.824112599 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.2 22.9334400587 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835076730862 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467256168605 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518134917095 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662327664697 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057679860896 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 13.2329268293 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.