The first graph, a bar chart, reveals data in pence per person per week spent on junk foods in Britain, and the line graph communicates the intake of fast food in grams from 1970 to 1990 respectively.
As an initial overview, people in Britain belonging to high and average income spent highest amount on hamburgers, whereas low income class people used more money on fish and chips. The high income people used less money on fish and chips while the average and low income class spent least amount on pizza. Clearly it can be seen in the line graph that in 1970 fish and chips was consumed the most and pizza the least, eventually hamburgers were consumed in high amounts and fish and chips was used less in 1990 .
Now, the specific details of bar graphs demonstrates that hamburgers costs included 40 pences and 32 pence per week respectively whereas fish and chips costs included approximately around 17 pence which was bought the least. The average income class and low income class used less money on pizza which included approximately 10 and 5 pence respectively while the low income spent highest on fish and chips which costed around 17 pence.
An analysis of the line graph depicts , fish and chips was consumed the most in 1970 which ranged around 300 grams and pizza was used very less which was around 20 grams. With time, the consumption of fish and chips went on decreasing and the consumption of pizza and hamburgers increased significantly. In 1990 hamburgers was consumed the highest which included 500 grams and fish and chips the lowest that was approximately 250 grams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... data in pence per person per week spent on junk foods in Britain, and the line g...
^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the highest'.
Suggestion: spent the highest
...in belonging to high and average income spent highest amount on hamburgers, whereas low incom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
... while the average and low income class spent least amount on pizza. Clearly it can be seen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and fish and chips was used less in 1990 . Now, the specific details of bar graph...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the highest'.
Suggestion: spent the highest
...pence respectively while the low income spent highest on fish and chips which costed around 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... An analysis of the line graph depicts , fish and chips was consumed the most in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 6.8 309% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81751824818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47542001766 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412408759124 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.9323781911 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4444444444 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117174714081 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647690158158 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791297488692 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105231688642 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102328433279 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.