The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
The designed graph illustrates the amount of money that four European countries spent to purchase six goods categories.
Overall, Britain, among the four countries listed, has spent much higher on the range of consumer goods included and merely Italy in the case of tennis racquets does come close. Users in Britain spent more or on the barrier of 160 thousand pounds to buy four items, the photographic film was the most popular ones.
As it presented, Germany has the lowest spender that is most obvious between entertainment goods such as CD, toys and photographic film, less than 150 thousand pounds sterling. Next came to, France only spends less than Germany in two cases, tennis racquets, and perfumes. In addition, both countries don’t have significant differences in personal stereos items.
Meanwhile, Italian consumer generally maintains middle rates than users within European, specifically; Italy spends more on personal stereos, tennis racquets and perfumers but less on CD and photographic film compared with France consumers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ennis racquets does come close. Users in Britain spent more or on the barrier of ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raphic film was the most popular ones. As it presented, Germany has the lowest ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51851851852 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70801280155 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66049382716 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9539558761 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199669851302 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956575433189 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110599431886 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145872385123 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122158077144 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.