The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.

Given is the chart illustrating the expenditure per month of contract for four kinds of mobile in a European nation between January and September in the year 2002.

Overall, a more detailed look at the picture reveals that while spending figures on Domo, Lex, Alpla increased after a 9-month period and vice versa for Sim TX although all of these cell phones witnessed several variations. In addition, Alpha had a surge to become the most prevalent in the end.

In January, Domo and Alpha ranked as the first and last point, at 15 euros and 5 euros respectively. After six months, the former climbed gradually to 20 euros, prior to certain fluctuations, the latter picked up the intial position and the lowest one as well. Even though Domo at first was threefold as much as Alpla, 25 euros were the given data of average expenditure of Alpha, being more than Domo, at about 20 and a half euros, in September.

As Lex had the same pattern, Sim TX underwent an opposite one in 2002, except for last three months. In June, the figure of these were also less than 15 euros. After that, Lex went up moderately evrey month, ending with the third rank, nevertheless Sim TX went down significantly to an approximate first statistic, finishing with the fourth one.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, nevertheless, so, third, well, while, except for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75909090909 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5642608846 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640909090909 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2479447184 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170879474597 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691085744617 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103577073738 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130221320876 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12723193262 0.0819641961636 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.