The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000
Given is a line graph illustrating how much electricity three kinds of energy sources ( coal, natural gas, petroleum ) could produce to provide New York City from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, a more detailed look at a picture reveals that petroleum was the most predominant source during the whole period. Among the three patterns, natural gas witnessed the most significant rise.
To commence with, the amount of petroleum stood at the highest point at 350 million kW hours, followed by fluctuation, in 1985, that went up considerably to 600 million kW hours, and went down to the first position. 5 years later. Finally, more than 700 million kW hours, double than the quantity at first, was the data of this source in 2000.
On the other hand, natural gas firstly had the lowest figure, 100 million kW hours, and still remained steady in the following 5 years, while coal increased moderately from 200 to 300 million kW hours. In the rest period, the former surged by marginally above 500 million kW hours that comprised the second point, whereas the latter had just under the data in 1980.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lectricity three kinds of energy sources coal, natural gas, petroleum could prod...
^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy sources coal, natural gas, petroleum could produce to provide New York City f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, so, still, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89784946237 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44335171973 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3619315915 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154911834624 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678710964597 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119283976442 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120351936208 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1500458409 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.