The graph below gives information from 1 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the number of six different fuels consumed in America from 1980 to 2030
Overall, it can be seen from the chart that there has been an increase the consumption of six fuels. In addition, fossil fuels have been used more prevalent than alternative energy sources.
While coal has gone up slightly annually from over 15 quads to around 30 quads except for leveling off between 1995 and 2005, natural gas standing at 20 quads was on several variations until 2015, followed by a plateau and ending with 25 quads. The largest volume among three fossil fuels has been petrol oil with 35 quads in 1980 and its comsumption will still maintain the first rank at just under 50 quads.
Nuclear, hydropower, solar and wind composed at the same point less than 5 quads. While nuclear has climbed slowly every year, solar and wind experienced certain fluctuations before 2010. For the renewable energy sources, the prediction is that its figures will be on a minimal rise just under 10 quads, especially hydropower will record the lowest point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ydropower will record the lowest point.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37538820739 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.711111111111 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2617788121 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855734753399 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347707002309 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366268549419 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602647235895 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380279019793 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.